Labor Minister Lisa Raitt told CBC News that she was “disappointed” that both sides rejected a proposal by a government-appointed arbitrator. The initial points of argument started from pensions.
"I have to say there doesn't seem to be a prospect of a deal right now, and I'm extremely disappointed,” Raitt said.
Ed Greenberg, spokesman for Canadian Pacific Rail, said Sunday that "the talks have ended and the legislative process, as I understand it, will now commence."
"They [CP] want to rely on the government to get something for them instead of collective bargaining, and we believe their actions are essentially in bad faith," said Doug Finnson, chief negotiator for the Teamsters Canada Rail Conference.
Raitt said that the CP strike was costing the Canadian economy million per week.
Meanwhile, one must ask what purpose the government should have in these matters. While the Conservatives rush in for management and the NDP rush in for their unions, are either side right by racing in?
Perhaps labor unions and management should be left alone to negotiate without government interference and without obvious government bias. Besides, don’t we live in a free society? People have the right to strike and the economy should be fine without the government needing to weigh in on every issue and dispute.
Should the government interfere with labor disputes? Let us know: Facebook, Twitter, Google+.
No comments:
Post a Comment