On Wednesday, the PMO released a statement which came clean about Wright's $90,172 gift to Duffy as part of a secret arrangement on February 20. Wright has since come under fire over his motive and how Duffy's actions seem to be linked with that deal.
In 2006, accountability was the paramount promise of Stephen Harper's campaign.
"There's going to be a new code on Parliament Hill: bend the rules, you will be punished; break the law, you will be charged; abuse the public trust, you will go to prison. If you behave unethically or dishonestly then do not expect a reward from this Prime Minister of Canada."
Stephen Harper, Conservative leader, November 30, 2005
However, Duffy wasn't held accountable for his fraudulent claim and based on Harper's standards, Wright rewarded him. With scrutiny coming from left, right and centre, the PMO's director of communications defended Wright saying he ensured taxpayer money was returned.
"The overarching concern for the government was that it was clear that the expenses that were claimed [by Duffy] were claimed improperly and had to be returned, and the government was firm in its desire to see those expenses repaid to the taxpayers of Canada.
Obviously, we are now engaged with the office of the ethics commissioner on this so I am not going to add any more comment to that. But from our perspective, the money had to be returned — had to be returned right away. And that was showed when the audits were tabled, that the expenses were improperly claimed and had to be returned, and they had been."
Andrew McDougall, PMO Director of Communications, May 17, 2013
In real life outside of Parliament, this kind of deal would never happen - certainly not for the price of $90,172.
Wright's gift is under investigation to see if it conflicts with the Senate's Conflict of Interest code. Senate rules require gifts greater than $500 to be disclosed within 30 days, which didn't happen. Senate rules also prohibit donations from being accepted if they are related to the Senator's position.
McDougall said the PMO is cooperating with the investigations and is "engaged with the ethics commissioner" but noted the Senate will handle the investigations of Duffy.
As for what will happen to Nigel Wright in light of the growing scandal, McDougall reaffirmed "Mr. Wright is staying on."
What do you think should happen to Harper's chief of staff Nigel Wright? Should he resign? Does the government's handling of the scandal contradict Harper's accountability promise of 2006? Share this article and join the discussion and let us know what you think: Facebook, Twitter, Google+.
Wright's gift is under investigation to see if it conflicts with the Senate's Conflict of Interest code. Senate rules require gifts greater than $500 to be disclosed within 30 days, which didn't happen. Senate rules also prohibit donations from being accepted if they are related to the Senator's position.
McDougall said the PMO is cooperating with the investigations and is "engaged with the ethics commissioner" but noted the Senate will handle the investigations of Duffy.
As for what will happen to Nigel Wright in light of the growing scandal, McDougall reaffirmed "Mr. Wright is staying on."
What do you think should happen to Harper's chief of staff Nigel Wright? Should he resign? Does the government's handling of the scandal contradict Harper's accountability promise of 2006? Share this article and join the discussion and let us know what you think: Facebook, Twitter, Google+.
Stephen Harper on Integrity: The Duffy Affair
What started as a $90,172 claim of inappropriate expenses seen as an outrage as part of abusive senate behaviour quickly escalated to a scandal with many more questions than answers. Get up to date with the full timeline.Read more
No comments:
Post a Comment